- Daily News for Senior Citizens

  FRONT PAGE • Aging • Health • Alzheimer's - Mental • Nutrition • Medicare & Medicaid • Politics  • Fitness  • Social Security • Alerts • Sex Health • Features • Retirement • Elder Care  >Search  >Senior Links


Senior Journal: Today's News and Information for Senior Citizens & Baby Boomers

More Senior Citizen News and Information Than Any Other Source -

• Go to more on Politics for Senior Citizens or More Senior News on the Front Page

E-mail this page to a friend!

Senior Citizen Politics

Political Squabbling May Cause U.S. to Fail to Improve Failing Health Care System

U.S. spends 50 percent more of GDP on health care, yet life expectancy growing slower here than in other countries; much higher medical costs and worse outcomes; aging population not cause costs

Nov. 12, 2013 – The aging of the population has not been the primary cause of high health care costs over the last decade in the U.S. Nor has it been the large number of tests and treatments being prescribed. Instead, new Johns Hopkins-led analysis suggests it has been the increasing prices of drugs, medical devices and hospital costs - prices that doctors, patients and insurers rarely know until the money has been spent. The administrative costs alone - the costs associated with physicians and hospitals procuring payment from health insurers and individuals - are rising by 6 percent a year.

Though many policymakers point to the elderly as the biggest consumers of health care, it is actually those younger than 65 with chronic illnesses who account for two-thirds of expenditures.

Study leader Hamilton Moses III, M.D., an adjunct professor of neurology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and former chief physician of The Johns Hopkins Hospital, says the paper outlines the "sobering reality" of the U.S. health care system in 2013 - one that is on an unsustainable path that needs righting, a task that seems ever bleaker in the current climate.

"Health care has become so politicized that rational discussions based on valid information have become impossible," says Moses, who also runs Alerion, Inc., a Virginia-based consulting group.

"But we are living in a time where we spend more money on health care than other developed countries and our outcomes are worse. Yet, we fail to understand the differences or to learn the others' lessons."


Moses discussed the research at a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. The study is published in the Nov. 13 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

The JAMA analysis, conducted with colleagues at the Boston Consulting Group and the University of Rochester School of Medicine, attempts to dispel several common misconceptions informing the current health care debate. The researchers used publicly available information about who pays for and who supplies medical care.


Related Stories


More news from JAMA released today -

Improvement in Health Care Outcomes Has Slowed in U.S. Finds Major Study

Included: economics of health care; people who receive care and organizations that provide care; value created in terms of objective health outcomes and perceptions of quality of care; potential factors driving change, including consolidation of insurers and health systems; the patient as consumer - see video

Nov. 12, 2013

Elderly Face Future of High Health Care Costs, Needless Pain, Distress in U.S. Without Change

Meeting the challenges of long lives requires substantial changes, quickly

Nov. 12, 2013

More archived stories:

Americans Have Worse Health Than People in Other Prosperous Countries Until They Pass Age 75

‘Americans are dying and suffering at rates that we know are unnecessary because people in other high-income countries are living longer lives and enjoying better health’

Jan. 25, 2013

Read more on Politics for Senior Citizens


While the average rate of growth has decreased steadily since the 1970s, Moses says the 18 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) that the United States spends on health care is 50 to 60 percent higher than any other developed country.

Life expectancy, which has been on the rise for a century, is now not growing as quickly in the United States as it is in the rest of the developed world, a shift that began in the 1980s, with the United States lagging by three years in both men and women.

Moreover, Moses says, patients are further removed than ever from the true cost of health care. Individuals' out-of-pocket costs declined from 23 percent of the cost of their medical care in 1980 to 11 percent of the cost in 2011.

Those costs have been shifted to employers and the federal government, whose share grew from 31 percent of costs to 42 percent over those same three decades. All of this despite the fact that the rate of growth in health care costs is not increasing as quickly as it has been.

Moses and his colleagues describe three major forces that will change health and medicine in the decade to come.

First is consolidation and industrialization, with a smaller number of much larger insurance companies and hospital systems. "This will result in less choice of where people get care. And they will likely be asked to shift their allegiance to an institution, rather than have a single physician," Moses says.

Second is information technology, which holds great promise to coordinate care and improve quality but, despite large investments, has not yet delivered on the promise.

Third is the patient acting as an informed consumer, gaining greater influence than today.

"Costs are completely invisible to you and to your doctor," he says. "Unless the prices of services, of drugs, of devices are known, you cannot have any kind of effective market. Moreover, many prices are fixed by the federal government or negotiated with hospitals confidentially, further removing levers that can lower prices."

Moses points out that the United States is also lagging behind the developed world in the proportion of primary care doctors, something that takes its toll not just in preventive medicine but in coordination of care once someone becomes sick. He says this comes through when, say, a person with diabetes or depression requires a joint replacement. These patients are much more likely to suffer complications, but few specialists are on the lookout for them.

"Specialists can attend to one problem, but few can see the totality," he says.

What is needed is an investment in people - in primary care doctors, in innovations that can streamline the process of care to improve outcomes. He says 4 percent of health care spending has gone to biomedical research into new technology (drugs and devices), while only 0.1 percent has gone to improving the process of care.

"Nearly every other industry has found a way to invest, reduce costs and improve outcomes," he says. The airlines, for example, after deregulation in the '70s, built information systems that allowed them to save on fuel, streamline routes and cut the cost-per-mile in half. Thirty years later, more people fly, consumers pay "rock bottom" prices, safety is far greater — but flying can now be an unpleasant experience, he says.

Would people tolerate less choice, less freedom in their health care? Moses doubts the airline model is the answer, he says, but a discussion, based on valid and unbiased information, must begin to truly innovate to deliver greater value and lower cost. Thus far, he says, "the political process has failed us badly."

"There is a risk that political squabbling will cause the country to miss a chance to achieve a more effective and efficient way to deliver care - one that truly reflects patients' needs and their preferences. The current state of health care is unsustainable, and tensions are only growing."


Johns Hopkins Medicine (JHM), headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland, is a $6.7 billion integrated global health enterprise and one of the leading academic health care systems in the United States. For more information about Johns Hopkins Medicine, its research, education and clinical programs, and for the latest health, science and research news, visit


Financial Relief for Volkswagen Diesel Owners

You may be eligible for money damages if you owned or leased one of these VW, Porsche or Audi vehicles.

In the major scandal of 2015, Volkswagen cheated you and the world. They rigged diesel emission controls so you, nor regulators, would know how much pollution their cars were adding to our environment.

They were caught and have reserved $7.3 billion to help "make it right" with victims.

If you owned or leased one of these vehicles, contact us now.

 Beth Janicek, Board Certified Personal Injury Attorney Janicek Law attorneys are actively pursuing these cases against VW. Do Not Wait...

Janicek Law Firm, PC

Free Consultation

(Call toll free)

1-877-795-3425 or Email

Vehicles Involved

VW Jetta (2009–2015)

VW Jetta SportWagen (2009–2014)

VW Golf (2010-2015)

VW Golf SportWagen (2015)

VW Beetle (2012–2015)

VW Passat (2012-2015)

Audi A3 (2010-2015)

VW Touareg (2009–2016)

Porsche Cayenne (2015)

Audi A6, A7, A8, Q5 Quattro (2016)


Search for more about this topic on

Google Web

Keep up with the latest news for senior citizens, baby boomers




Published by New Tech Media -

Other New Tech Media sites include,,,, etc.