SeniorJournal.com - Daily News for Senior Citizens

  FRONT PAGE Aging • Health • Alzheimer's - Mental • Nutrition • Medicare & Medicaid Politics  • Fitness  • Social Security • Alerts • Sex Health • Features • Retirement  Elder Care  >Search  >Senior Links

[NavBar.htm]

Senior Journal: Today's News and Information for Senior Citizens & Baby Boomers

More Senior Citizen News and Information Than Any Other Source - SeniorJournal.com

• Go to more on Politics for Senior Citizens or More Senior News on the Front Page

E-mail this page to a friend!

Senior Citizen Politics

Fiscal Cliff: What Is At Stake for Medicare, Medicaid as Budget Battles Get Underway?

Medicare and Medicaid are big targets as the Congress and White House begin urgent task of preventing the government from falling off the “Fiscal Cliff’

Nov. 15, 2012- The budget negotiations scenarios that may include Medicare are discussed by Mary Agnes Carey of Kaiser Health News in an interview by Jackie Judd. They also look at where the “doc fix” (Medicare pay raise for doctors) fits into the budget picture and whether Medicaid cuts are possible.

>>Watch video above, listen to the audio or read a transcript below:

JACKIE JUDD: Good day, this is Health on the Hill. I’m Jackie Judd. A year ago this month, negotiations on Capitol Hill to reduce the federal deficit collapsed. A year later, have the political dynamics shifted enough so that there is an opportunity for a deal? And if so, how might that affect Medicare and Medicaid? Here to sort through that question is Mary Agnes Carey, senior correspondent for Kaiser Health News.

Mary Agnes, you’ve spent a lot of time this week listening to what people were saying on Capitol Hill. Are you hearing anything different? Is the tone different? Could there be a deal?

MARY AGNES CAREY: Everyone seems to be talking about a “balanced approach.” We hear this from the president. We hear it from Democrats. We hear it from Republicans. The president and Democrats are saying to Republicans, “If you move on taxes, if you ask some high-income individuals to pay more on taxes, we’ll move on entitlements, on Medicare and Medicaid.”

   

People seem very, very open to this idea of avoiding the fiscal cliff, of avoiding these automatic spending cuts that are set to kick in in January. But the thing we have to remember from watching Capitol Hill for a long time is that this is where folks always are at the beginning of a negotiation.

 

Related Stories

 
 

Changes in Medicare Expected in Negotiations to Avoid the ‘Fiscal Cliff’

‘Lawmakers are wrestling with finding a balance between asking beneficiaries to pay more for Medicare services and reducing payments to Medicare providers’

Nov. 14, 2012

Obamacare Gets New Life with Election Win by President Obama; Takes Place in History

President’s second term will be about bringing the law to life; Obama reelection, Democrats holding the Senate will solidify the law in American history - see editor's notes on benefits for seniors

Nov. 7, 2012

Seniors Satisfied With Medicare, Anxious About Future, Survey Finds

'Somewhat surprising how many seniors would be willing to pay more for Medicare'

Oct. 19, 2012

GOP Premium Support Plan Could Raise Medicare Premiums In Many Parts of Country

A central part of the House Republican budget written by Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, now GOP’s vice-presidential candidate; also embraced by Mitt Romney

Oct. 15, 2012


Read more on Politics for Senior Citizens

 

JACKIE JUDD: And when it comes to Medicare, is the struggle over, as it always seems to be, how to balance the pain between the patient and the provider?

MARY AGNES CAREY: Right. That is definitely the balance that’s in the works. If you ask beneficiaries to contribute more, what do you ask the providers to do?

For example, some ideas that are out there, they’ve been around for a while: Do you look at the fee-for-service Medicare structure on co-payments and deductibles? Combine those into one deductible, for example, but add a catastrophic cap, which doesn’t exist in fee-for-service Medicare.

On providers: As we know, their payments will continue to increase over the next ten years, but under the health care law they’re going to do so at a slower rate. So do you go back to providers, to hospitals, to the nursing homes, to home health care agencies, and take more from them?

And how do you balance that pain to get an equal result?

JACKIE JUDD: At this point last year, the president was suggesting that he could go along possibly with raising the eligibility age. Is that something that his liberal base is suggesting this year can be in play?

MARY AGNES CAREY: Chris Van Hollen, who is in the House Democratic leadership, suggested, in fact, this week that it should be in play. But there are others -- Chuck Schumer comes to mind, a Democratic senator from New York. He had a forum at the Press Club about a month ago, and he suggested that the eligibility age would not be raised and that it was extremely unpopular. But again, it’s one of those items – same thing happened in Social Security. If you gradually raise it over a period of time, the thought is it doesn’t happen right away, it doesn’t affect beneficiaries right away, but over time you can save a lot of money.

JACKIE JUDD: The “doc fix.” That, separate and apart from the fiscal cliff negotiations, comes up at about the end of the year. Does it get folded into these discussions?

MARY AGNES CAREY: That’s what I think. Because the political will, the momentum that it will take to get this big package would mean you stick in everything you can. And that’s an additional pressure point, because if Congress doesn’t step in, physicians who accept Medicare reimbursement are going to be cut 27 percent in January.

Congress routinely steps in to fix it – I think it will be folded into the bigger deal, if there is one.

JACKIE JUDD: And Medicaid: Less in the crosshairs, it seems this time. But what’s possible there?

MARY AGNES CAREY: There are a lot of ideas out there. For example, instead of the federal government picking up a fixed percentage of a state cost, you would have something called a Medicaid per-capita cap. Some people love this. Some people hate it. Nonetheless, it’s on the table.

Congress could also step in and change a state’s ability to assess provider taxes in Medicaid which affect their federal share of money. And another idea that has been out there is something called the blended rate. Instead of the federal government reimbursing states at one rate for Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, you blend those.

But, again, the concern here from people who represent Medicaid beneficiaries is: Will this simply mean less money and cuts in services for those beneficiaries?

JACKIE JUDD: Congress, lawmakers go home soon for Thanksgiving. Then they come back. If they want to get back home before Christmas, it only gives them 3-4 weeks to make all of this happen.

Have you heard any suggestion yet that this could be pushed over to January, with the argument that the new Congress should deal with these big issues?

MARY AGNES CAREY: That argument is certainly out there, but also if you allow that to happen, if you allow the Bush-era tax cuts to expire, if you don’t patch the alternative minimum tax in the tax code, if you allow the doc fix to not be fixed and those cuts to happen, that’s a lot of mess for the next Congress to clean up.

And while we’ll have some new members in January and some members who are staying, it’s still divided government. Democrats still control the White House and the Senate. Republicans still control the House. So there’s some thought that if you can’t get the big deal, you at least get a down payment with the details filled in later.

JACKIE JUDD: OK. Thank you, Mary Agnes Carey of Kaiser Health News.

MARY AGNES CAREY: Thank you, Jackie.

Some of this information is reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives and sign up for email delivery. © Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

 

Financial Relief for Volkswagen Diesel Owners

You may be eligible for money damages if you owned or leased one of these VW, Porsche or Audi vehicles.

In the major scandal of 2015, Volkswagen cheated you and the world. They rigged diesel emission controls so you, nor regulators, would know how much pollution their cars were adding to our environment.

They were caught and have reserved $7.3 billion to help "make it right" with victims.

If you owned or leased one of these vehicles, contact us now.

 Beth Janicek, Board Certified Personal Injury Attorney Janicek Law attorneys are actively pursuing these cases against VW. Do Not Wait...

Janicek Law Firm, PC

Free Consultation

(Call toll free)

1-877-795-3425 or Email

Vehicles Involved

VW Jetta (2009–2015)

VW Jetta SportWagen (2009–2014)

VW Golf (2010-2015)

VW Golf SportWagen (2015)

VW Beetle (2012–2015)

VW Passat (2012-2015)

Audi A3 (2010-2015)

VW Touareg (2009–2016)

Porsche Cayenne (2015)

Audi A6, A7, A8, Q5 Quattro (2016)

 

Search for more about this topic on SeniorJournal.com

Google Web SeniorJournal.com

Keep up with the latest news for senior citizens, baby boomers

Copyright: SeniorJournal.com

    

 

Published by New Tech Media - www.NewTechMedia.com

Other New Tech Media sites include CaroleSutherland.com, BethJanicek.com, SASeniors.com, DrugDanger.com, etc.