SENIOR JOURNAL.COM - Senior Citizens Information and News

Front Page    Search     Contact Us     Advertise in Senior Journal


SeniorJournal.com

INDEX


FRONT PAGE

PAGE TWO
More Headlines

 • General Features

 • Find Help

 • SENIOR ALERTS

 • Baby Boomers

 • Odds & Ends

Health-Fitness

 • Aging

 • Alzheimer's & Dementia

 • Fitness

 • Health/Medicine

 • Medical Research

 • Nutrition/Vitamin

Government

 • Politics

 • Medicare

 • Medicare Drug Program

 • Medicare Q&A - Dear Marci

 • Medicaid

 • Social Security

 • Social Security, Medicare Q&A

 • Social Security Reform

Enjoying Life

 • Books

 • Entertainment

 • Features

 • Grandparents

 • Senior Statistics

 • Senior Stars

 • Sex & Seniors

 • Sports

 • Travel

 • Senior Volunteers

On The Web

 • Links - Senior

 • Senior Friendly Business Links

 • Sites We Like

Elderly Issues

 • Elder Care

 • Assistance for Elderly

 • Housing

Money 

 • Discounts

 • Guarding Your Wealth for Seniors

 • Money Matters

 • Reverse Mortgage

 • Retirement

Thinking

 • Opinions



Senior Journal: Today's News and Information for Senior Citizens & Baby Boomers

More Senior Citizen News and Information Than Any Other Source - SeniorJournal.com

• Go to more on Opinions or Medicaid or More Senior News on the Front Page

 

Click here to vitamins without a pill.


 
 

E-mail this page to a friend!

Opinions

House Budget Bill Unfairly Punishes Elderly, ElderLawAnswers Warns

Leading elder law Website warns that House bill cutting Medicaid would drastically change asset transfer rules, punishing older Americans

Nov. 29, 2005 - House and Senate conferees will soon sit down to reconcile two very different budget bills that cut billions from the Medicaid program. The House bill, H.R. 4241, contains provisions that will punish unwitting elders who have given their families modest gifts, and will force some middle-income elderly to sell their homes and spend down the proceeds, warns ElderLawAnswers (www.elderlawanswers.com), the nation's leading elder law Web site.

 

Related Stories

 
 

House Joins Senate in Passing Budget Cuts Including Medicaid

Nov. 18, 2005 – After embarrassing failures by the Republican leadership in the House of Representatives to pass a bill to cut the federal budget, they finally passed the finish line early this morning with a 217 to 215 vote victory. The House bill has major differences from the bill passed by the Senate yesterday 64-33, including cuts in Medicaid, which will impact millions of senior citizens. President Bush has said he will veto the Senate bill, should its provision for additional taxes on oil companies be part of the compromise. Read more...

Finance Committee Passes $10 Billion in Cuts for Medicare, Medicaid

Most savings will come from making pharmaceutical industry pay more, doctors get big pay boost

Oct. 26, 2005 – Senior citizens and their advocates most likely breathed a sigh of relief with the passage of a spending cut package by the Senate Finance Committee last night. It cuts $10 billion over five years from Medicare and Medicaid, but the cuts are primarily aimed at reducing subsidies for the pharmaceutical industry. The downside for some seniors was some tightening of rules for transferring personal assets to others when trying to qualify for Medicaid. Read more...

Medicaid Commission Finds $1 Billion More Than Asked to Cut

Charged by HHS with finding $10 billion in savings over five years they exceed goal

Sept. 1, 2005 – The Medicaid Commission, which was to tell Health and Human Services how to save $10 billion dollars over five years, presented their report today and it includes suggested reforms that they project will save the government $11 billion – a billion dollars more than their goal. Read more...

More news on Medicaid - click here

 

Both the House bill and its Senate counterpart, S. 1932, make it more difficult for America's middle-class elderly to transfer assets and later qualify for Medicaid coverage of nursing home care.

But while the Senate bill would close loopholes to curb abusive Medicaid planning, the House bill would impose punitive new restrictions on asset transfers. Two proposed rule changes in the House bill are particularly threatening to older Americans.

Under the first rule change, the penalty for transferring assets will begin on (1) the date of the transfer, (2) the date of institutionalization, or (3) the date of application for Medicaid, whichever is later.

An example will explain the problem with this proposal. Let's say a grandmother gives each of her four grandchildren $10,000 on December 1st of this year. In a state with an average monthly nursing home expense of $5,000, this will cause eight months of ineligibility. Under current law, the penalty period begins on the date of transfer, so the penalty period will commence on December 1st and expire after eight months.

Let’s assume that in one year, in December 2006, the grandmother has a stroke and moves to a nursing home and that she spends down her savings paying for her care over the following year. This would mean that under current law, she would be eligible for Medicaid on December 1, 2007.

But under the House’s proposal, if she applied for Medicaid on that date, her eight-month penalty period would not begin until then, leaving her ineligible for benefits for eight months. Who would pay for her care during that time? Probably not the grandchildren, who may have used the funds for their college tuition or for other purposes. The answer is likely that it will be the nursing home that will have to front the cost.

The grandmother or her family could have avoided this problem if they had applied for Medicaid on December 1, 2006, when she entered the nursing home. Under the House proposal, this would have triggered the penalty at that time. But because the initial application would be denied, this would mean that two applications would have to be filed instead of one, resulting in twice as much work for the family and for the state Medicaid agency. (Actually, this would probably mean even more than twice as many Medicaid applications since virtually everyone would have to apply for Medicaid upon moving to a nursing home, many of whom would pass away before becoming Medicaid-eligible. Under current law, these individuals would never apply for Medicaid at all.)

The second harmful proposal in the House bill would limit the equity in a home that may be protected to $750,000. Those with homes of greater value would be ineligible for Medicaid coverage of long-term care. The problem with this proposal is that it is inequitable. In some parts of the country a $750,000 home is a mansion; in others, modest homes have market values exceeding this amount.

The Senate bill makes appropriate changes to the Medicaid eligibility rules that prevent practices seen as loopholes by most observers. The House bill, on the other hand, intends to punish seniors and their families. The irony is that the result will be that the seniors most severely penalized will be those who don’t avail themselves of elder law counsel.

About ElderLawAnswers:

Created by a nationwide network of attorneys, ElderLawAnswers (www.elderlawanswers.com) provides consumers with clear information on legal issues facing older Americans. Consumers may find qualified elder law attorneys searchable by state or telephone area code. The site offers primers on Medicaid, Medicare, estate planning, long-term care planning, and more. Other handy tools include calculators and checklists.

Books About Politics

Books on Senior Politics

 

 

Click to More Senior News on the Front Page

Copyright: SeniorJournal.com

     Back to Top

 

Published by New Tech Media - www.NewTechMedia.com

Other New Tech Media sites include CaroleSutherland.com, BethJanicek.com, www.DeweySquare.com, SASeniors.com, DrugDanger.com, etc.

E-mail - editor@SeniorJournal.com