|
E-mail this page to a friend!
Our Opinion
Social Security: Senior Citizens Should Sink the
Swift Boaters; Throw a Life Preserver to AARP
Let's strengthen the system we have now, before
considering private accounts
By Tucker Sutherland, editor, SeniorJournal.com
Feb. 21, 2005 The battle over how to reform
Social Security is about to get ugly. The Bush team hopes to squash the
AARP by using some of the same tactics they used to dispatch John Kerry
in the presidential race. The people responsible for the infamous Swift
Boat Veterans campaign are now gearing up to sink AARP because of their
opposition to the Bush plan to take money out of the Social Security
program and put it in private investment accounts.
|
More news on
Social Security Reform
Click Here |
|
|
More opinions on
political issues for seniors
Click Here |
|
At the same time, Bush loyalist are hitting the
campaign trail this week to promote the idea of private investment
accounts and they are armed with a training CD and 30-page memo from
Frank Luntz, a veteran Republican strategist, teaching them how to sell
the idea to voters.
To older Americans, Luntz suggests stressing that
their benefits will be safe but that their grandchildren's are
threatened unless Bush gets his way, according to Steven Thomma and
James Kuhnhenn who reported the story for Knight Ridder Newspapers.
"This point, though simple, is extraordinarily
powerful, especially with older women. ... It is the only way that you
can sell them on this proposal," continues the Luntz instructions
The Bush campaign for private accounts is also
using tactics the administration used effectively in getting public
support for the invasion of Iraq. It is much like the old
bait-and-switch tactics used by unscrupulous retailers. In that
campaign, they kept holding up the vision of the terrorist attack on New
York and talking about the war on terror, and they would mention
attacking Iraq. In reality, there was no association between the two
the situation in Iraq and the war on the people who attacked American on
September 11, 2001.
A similar tactic is being used now in the Social Security campaign. In
every speech the President tell us how the Social Security system in
going to run out of money if something is not done to make changes. Then
he talks about his idea for private investment accounts.
Private investment accounts will do nothing to
improve the viability of Social Security. Allowing taxpayers to divert
taxes they now pay to support Social Security into the stock market will
only make Social Security run out of money faster.
But, raising the alarm about Social Security
running out of money just as Bush did about the threat from terrorist
and then mentioning private investment accounts just as he did Iraq
too many voters come away thinking they are related.
"Siphoning money from Social Security will not
strengthen it," says David Certner, AARP's director of federal affairs.
"It will just make the problem much worse."
AARP is right on this one. We have not always
agreed with AARP and often find it difficult to see this monolithic,
self-perpetuating organization that makes billions from selling stuff to
older Americans as a voice for senior citizens. Okay, I know they claim
the organization that sells insurance, drugs, investments, etc., is
different from the membership organization. Then, too, when they try to
speak for people as young as 50, they are really not a senior citizens
organization.
It was hard to understand why they supported the
Bush Medicare package, without looking at all they money that comes into
AARP from selling insurance and drugs. You just had to think they saw
financial benefits to supporting the Presidents Medicare program that
was going to push more business and tons of federal dollars to private
organizations.
Still, AARP does provide some good services for
senior citizens and baby boomers and I dont think they are deserving of
the bashing they are about to take.
The lobbying group, USA Next, which has poured
millions of dollars into Republican policy battles, now says it plans to
spend as much as $10 million on commercials and other tactics assailing
AARP, the powerhouse lobby opposing the private investment accounts at
the center of Bush's plan, reported Glen Justice in the New York Times.
Justice wrote, "They are the boulder in the middle
of the highway to personal savings accounts, said Charlie Jarvis, the
group's president and former deputy secretary for the interior in the
Reagan and first Bush administrations. We will be the dynamite that
removes them.
Jarvis said the group's goal was to peel off one
million members from the AARP, by presenting itself as a conservative,
free-market alternative. He says USA Next surveys show more than 37
percent of the AARP members call themselves Republicans, according to
Justice.
"We are going to take them on in hand-to-hand
combat," said Jarvis, who is biting in his remarks about AARP, calling
the group "stodgy, overweight, bureaucratic and out of touch."
Formerly known as the United Seniors Association,
USA Next was founded in 1991 by Richard Viguerie, a Republican pioneer
and mastermind of direct mailings, who raised millions from older
Americans using solicitations that sent alarming messages about Social
Security.
To allow taxpayers to invest part of their Social
Security tax may not be a bad idea. But, it is not part of the
discussion over how we strengthen Social Security to assure it can pay
benefits for future generations.
Lets first decide how we are going to assure
future payments, and then we can discuss some private investment
opportunity as an add-on that may increase more Social Security income
for our children.
We also need to stand up AARPs right to state a
public opinion without facing destruction by a vicious political
machine. They way they plan to destroy AARP is by convincing members to
cancel their memberships.
Frankly, I have not renewed my membership, but I am
going to do so today. I hope you will join me. And, maybe even more
important, I hope you will not cancel your membership if it is already
paid.
Lets put the brakes on private accounts right now.
Lets decide first how we are going to actually strengthen the Social
Security program we have now.
To learn more about the AARP position on Social Security Click here
To go to the complete New York Times story Click here
To go to the complete Knight Ridder story Click Here
Click to More Senior News on the
Front Page
Copyright: SeniorJournal.com |