SENIOR JOURNAL.COM - Senior Citizens Information and News

Front Page    Search     Contact Us     Advertise in Senior Journal


SeniorJournal.com

INDEX


FRONT PAGE

PAGE TWO
More Headlines

 • General Features

 • Find Help

 • SENIOR ALERTS

 • Baby Boomers

 • Odds & Ends

Health-Fitness

 • Aging

 • Alzheimer's & Dementia

 • Fitness

 • Health/Medicine

 • Medical Research

 • Nutrition/Vitamin

Government

 • Politics

 • Medicare

 • Medicare Drug Program

 • Medicare Q&A - Dear Marci

 • Medicaid

 • Social Security

 • Social Security, Medicare Q&A

Enjoying Life

 • Books

 • Entertainment

 • Features

 • Grandparents

 • Senior Statistics

 • Senior Stars

 • Sex & Seniors

 • Sports

 • Travel

 • Senior Volunteers

On The Web

 • Links - Senior

 • Senior Friendly Business Links

 • Sites We Like

Elderly Issues

 • Elder Care

 • Assistance for Elderly

 • Housing

Money 

 • Discounts

 • Guarding Your Wealth for Seniors

 • Money Matters

 • Reverse Mortgage

 • Retirement

Thinking

 • Opinions



Senior Journal: Today's News and Information for Senior Citizens & Baby Boomers

More Senior Citizen News and Information Than Any Other Source - SeniorJournal.com

• Go to more on Health & Medicine or More Senior News from SeniorJournal.com on the Front Page

 

Click here to vitamins without a pill.


   

E-mail this page to a friend!

Health & Medicine for Senior Citizens

Study Says Men are Not Adequately Involved in Prostate Cancer Screening Discussions

Another new study finds screened men up to four times more likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer than unscreened men

Sept. 28, 2009 - Men largely make decisions about prostate cancer screening based on conversations with their clinicians, but these discussions often do not include information about the risks of testing in addition to the benefits, according to a report in the September 28 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.

A second report in the same issue uses statistical modeling to estimate the benefits and risks of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in men of various ages and risk levels.

 

Related Stories

 
 

Study Shows Seed Implants a Suitable Prostate Cancer Treatment Option for Older Men

Prostate cancer treatment ‘outcomes are impacted by disease-related risk factors but not by age

Aug. 4, 2009


Men Who Delay Radical Treatment of Prostate Cancer Don’t Seem to Worry About It

Men with neurotic personalities and those in poor physical health exhibited more anxiety and distress than others

July 27, 2009


Heavy Alcohol Drinking Spurs High-Grade Prostate Cancer, Stops Prevention by Finasteride

Four or more drinks on 5 or more days per week doubles risk of high-grade prostate cancer

July 13, 2009


Predicting the Return of Prostate Cancer Improved by Results from John Hopkins Study

May also help resolve the debate on when, and in what form, secondary treatments should occur

July 2, 2009


PARP Drugs May Be Miracle Cure for Cancer Suggests Success with Breast, Ovarian, Prostate Cancer

NEJM editorial says PARP inhibitors may point to a new direction for anticancer drugs - watch video

June 25, 2009


Veterans Badly Mistreated for Prostate Cancer at VA Hospital, Reports NY Times

92 of 116 cancer treatments were botched during a six year period at Philadelphia unit

June 22, 2009


More Links Below News Story


Read the latest news on Senior Health & Medicine

 

The majority of American men older than 50 have been screened with the PSA blood test. This practice, however, is controversial because there is no convincing evidence that screening prevents deaths from the disease, and treating early-stage cancers detected by screenings may lead to important complications.

"Given the uncertain benefit for screening and known treatment risks, prostate cancer screening decisions should be guided by patient preferences," the authors write.

"Indeed, most professional organizations recommend that the first step in screening should be a discussion between health care providers and patients about the risks and benefits of early detection and treatment so that patients can make informed decisions about whether to be screened."

Richard M. Hoffman, M.D., M.P.H., of New Mexico VA Health Care System and University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, and colleagues conducted a telephone survey of 3,010 randomly selected English-speaking adults age 40 and older in 2006 and 2007.

The sample included 375 men who had either undergone or discussed PSA testing with their clinicians in the previous two years. These men were asked what they knew about prostate cancer, what their discussions with clinicians were like and what factors and sources of information influenced their screening decisions.

Overall, 69.9 percent of the men had discussed screening with their clinician before making a decision, including 14.4 percent who chose not to undergo testing.

Most often, clinicians raised the idea of screening (64.6 percent), and 73.4 percent recommended it. Recommendation from a clinician was the only characteristic of the discussion associated with testing.

"Although respondents generally endorsed shared decision-making process and felt informed, only 69.9 percent actually discussed screening before making a testing decision, few subjects (32%) reported having discussed the cons of screening, 45.2 percent said they were not asked for their preference about PSA testing and performance on knowledge testing was poor." Only 47.8 percent of men correctly answered any of three questions about prostate cancer risk and screening accuracy, the authors write.

"Therefore, these discussions - when held - did not meet criteria for shared decision making. Our findings suggest that patients need a greater level of involvement in screening discussions and to be better informed about prostate cancer screening issues."

Another Study Looks at PSA Screening Effectiveness

In a second study, Kirsten Howard, B.Sc., M.App.Sc., M.P.H., M.Health.Econ., Ph.D., of the University of Sydney, Australia, and colleagues constructed a statistical model to provide information for men age 40, 50, 60 and 70 years at low, moderate and high risk for prostate cancer based on family history.

Using Australian prostate cancer incidence rates before PSA screening began in 1989 and cancer death rates in 2005, along with data from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer and the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the authors examined two hypothetical cohorts of men who either participated in or declined annual PSA screening.

The model predicts that benefits and harms of annual PSA screening vary with age and risk level.

For example, for every 1,000 60-year-old men at low risk, 53 of those who were screened yearly would be diagnosed with prostate cancer and 3.5 would die of the disease during a 10-year period, compared with 23 diagnoses and 4.4 deaths in unscreened men.

"For 1,000 men screened from 40 to 69 years of age, there will be 27.9 prostate cancer deaths and 639.5 deaths overall by age 85 years compared with 29.9 prostate cancer deaths and 640.4 deaths overall in unscreened men," the study says.

"Higher-risk men have more prostate cancer deaths averted but also more prostate cancers diagnosed and related harms."

In the model, screened men are two to four times more likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer than unscreened men, but death rates from prostate cancer and from all causes are not significantly different.

This implies that many men whose cancer is detected by PSA screening may be undergoing treatment for clinically insignificant cancers, the authors note.

"In conclusion, before undergoing PSA screening, men should be aware of the possible benefits and harms and of their chances of these benefits and harms occurring," they write.

"Even under optimistic assumptions, the net mortality benefit is small, even when prostate cancer deaths are cumulated to 85 years of age. These quantitative estimates can be used to support the goal of individual informed choices about PSA screening."

Editorial: Study Helps Highlight Difficulties of Shared Decision Making

Virtually every professional organizations' PSA screening guidelines urge clinicians to engage patients in shared decision making before performing PSA testing, write Steven H. Woolf, M.D., M.P.H., of Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, and Alex Krist, M.D., M.P.H., in an accompanying editorial.

"Definitions of shared decision making vary, but the term generally refers to the effort to help patients understand the benefits, harms and uncertainties of available options and to apply personal preferences to determine the best choice. Both parties share information, jointly participate in decision making and agree on a course of action that incorporates personal preferences."

"Today's practice environment presents few incentives or support tools for those clinicians and patients who prefer a discussion rather than simply marking a checkbox for PSA on a laboratory requisition form," they continue.

"In the United States, where medical technologies are often adopted long before their effectiveness and safety are confirmed, the difficulties of implementing shared decision making for prostate cancer screening will likely recur with other modalities of care. What is ultimately required is a deeper change in culture among providers and consumers of health care to delay dissemination, resist the assumption that newer is better, wait for evidence, tolerate observation over intervention and accept uncertainty."

Editorial: Information Can Aid Discussion of PSA Screening

"Data from the National Survey of Medical Decisions reported in this issue of the Archives suggest that many patients have not had an opportunity to discuss the full range of issues related to the PSA screening decision," writes Michael Pignone, M.D., M.P.H., of University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, in an accompanying editorial.

"Because of the complexity of factors that need to be considered in such discussions, tools have been developed to help guide providers and patients in considering the benefits and downsides of screening and in reaching a value-concordant decision," he continues.

"One type of tool, patient decision aids, has been shown to increase patient knowledge, participation and confidence."

"To inform the development of future decision aids, Howard and colleagues present a balance sheet of the consequences of PSA screening in Australian men from different age groups and with different levels of underlying risk," Dr. Pignone continues. "The work by Howard and colleagues is an important step in providing information to patients and providers to facilitate discussion about this trade-off."

Editor's Note: Dr. Pignone is supported by an Established Investigator Award from the National Cancer Institute and by the Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making.

More Links to Reports on Prostate Cancer

Prostate Cancer Test Proven to Offer Early Prediction of Bone Metastasis, Mortality

UCSF Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment gives patients and doctors a better way of gauging long-term risks and pinpointing high risk cases.

June 15, 2009


New Blood Test Significantly Increases Accuracy of PSA Screening for Prostate Cancer

Greatly reduces false-positives in prostate cancer screening that often require a biopsy of the gland to check for tumors

May 28, 2009


Men Should Not Give Up on PSA Prostate Cancer Screening, Just Yet

Urologists argue that men should not be swayed from getting the test - it still saves lives

May 13, 2009

 

Statins Protect Against Prostate Cancer, Erectile Dysfunction and Prostate Enlargement, Mayo Study Finds

Study followed older men 40 to 79 from 1990 to assess urologic outcomes among aging men

April 27, 2009


Elderly Men with Short Life Expectancy Do Not Need Prostate Cancer Screening, Study Shows

U.S. trial shows no early mortality benefit from current annual screening for prostate cancer - watch video, link in story

March 19, 2009


Enough is Enough of Prostate-Specific-Antigen Testing Once Men Reach Age 75

PSA test has decreased prostate cancer deaths but other problems more likely to kill elderly

Feb. 23, 2009


Simple Urine Test May Reveal the Aggressiveness of Your Prostate Cancer

Sarcosine is better indicator of advancing disease than traditional prostate specific antigen test (PSA); it is detected in urine, researchers hopeful simple urine test can be used

Feb. 12, 2009


Artificial Light at Night Contributes to Prostate Cancer and Breast Cancer Say Researchers

Theories for cause: suppression of melatonin production, suppression of immune system, body's biological clock confused between night and day

Feb. 3, 2009


GPS for the Body Sometimes Needed for a Moving Prostate During Radiation Therapy

Prostate can move during a treatment session and can make delivering radiation safely to the tumor a challenge

By Constantine A. Mantz, MD

Jan. 21, 2009


Selenium or Vitamin E to Stop Prostate Cancer May Do More Harm Than Good

National Cancer Institute stops clinical trial from going forward

Oct. 27, 2008


Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Strikes Up to 90 Percent of Oldest Men, Can Be Life-Threatening

It’s Prostate Health Month and urologist say cancer is not the only thing senior citizens should watch for

Sept. 29, 2008


High Cholesterol Bad for Heart but May Also Increases Prostate Cancer Risk

September both National Prostate Health and National Cholesterol Education Months

Sept. 18, 2008


Common Painkillers Like Aspirin Seem to Lower PSA Level that Predicts Prostate Cancer

Not enough data to say that men who took the medications were less likely to get prostate cancer

Sept. 8, 2008


Height Linked to Prostate Cancer Development, Growth in Review of 58 Studies

‘We speculate that factors that influence height may also influence cancer and height is therefore acting as a marker for the causal factors’

Sept. 3, 2008

Brachytherapy May Be Best Prostate Cancer Treatment Choice for Obese Men

Follows finding that surgery is technically more challenging in overweight men

Aug. 19, 2008


Prostate Screening Bias Against Obese Men Leads to Late Detection, Less Surgical Success

Aggressiveness of obese men's late-detected tumors and that they may be more difficult to remove, is a double whammy for fat guys

Aug. 8, 2008


Task Force Says Men Age 75 and Older Should Not Be Screened for Prostate Cancer

Chances are they will die of something else before the cancer gets them

Aug. 5, 2008


Androgen Deprivation Does Not Improve Survival for Seniors with Prostate Cancer

Conservative management of the disease does a better job, says study

July 8, 2008


Radiation for Cancer Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy Shows Increased Survival

Provocative evidence that even men with adverse prognostic features may benefit from salvage radiotherapy

June 17, 2008


Older Men With Prostate Cancer at Much Greater Risk of Bone Fractures

Patients should be checked for osteoporosis, particularly if treated with ADT

May 14, 2008

 

Search for more about this topic on SeniorJournal.com

Google Web SeniorJournal.com

Keep up with the latest news for senior citizens, baby boomers

 

Click to More Senior News on the Front Page

Copyright: SeniorJournal.com

    

 

Published by New Tech Media - www.NewTechMedia.com

Other New Tech Media sites include CaroleSutherland.com, BethJanicek.com, SASeniors.com, DrugDanger.com, etc.