|
Survey Of Seniors In Eight
States Finds Nearly One In Four Skipping Doses Or Not Filling
Prescriptions Due To Cost
Almost One-Quarter of Seniors Reported
Spending at Least $100 per Month on Prescription Drugs in 2001
Aug. 1, 2002 -
A survey of seniors in eight states released today by the Kaiser
Family Foundation and the Commonwealth Fund finds nearly one quarter
of seniors report skipping doses of medicine or not filling
prescriptions because of costs. Close to one in four seniors report
spending at least $100 per month on their prescription medicines in
2001. The survey also finds that access and scope of drug coverage
depend substantially on where seniors live. Even in states with the
highest rates of prescription drug coverage, roughly one in five
seniors lacked drug coverage.
An article
published online today in the journal Health Affairs and a companion
report, "Seniors and Prescription Drugs: Findings from a 2001 Survey
of Seniors in Eight States," feature results from the 2001 survey of
10,927 Medicare beneficiaries ages 65 and older conducted in
California, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, New York, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, and Texas. These states account for 42 percent of adults
ages 65 and older, and 41 percent of low-income elderly adults (below
200 percent of poverty) nationwide. Dana Gelb Safran, Sc.D., who
directs The Health Institute at Tufts-New England Medical Center, led
the joint Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts research team.
"Medicare
beneficiaries are already spending over one-fifth of their incomes on
health care," said Karen Davis, Ph.D., president of The Commonwealth
Fund, "For the sickest among them, the specter of wiping out
retirement savings on rising prescription drug costs is truly
frightening."
"With one in
four seniors skipping medications, lack of drug coverage is more than
a financial burden-it's a health risk for seniors," said Drew Altman,
Ph.D., president and CEO of the Kaiser Family Foundation.
COVERAGE
The survey finds that the percentage of seniors who do not have
prescription drug coverage varies substantially by state: California
(18%), New York (19%), Pennsylvania (21%), Ohio (22%), Colorado (23%),
Michigan (25%), Illinois (31%) and Texas (31%). The range was even
wider among for low-income seniors, where the share lacking drug
coverage ranged from 20% in New York and California to 38% in Michigan
and Texas.
The survey also
finds substantial differences among states in the sources of drug
coverage available to seniors. Employer-sponsored plans, for example,
provide drug coverage to approximately half of seniors in Michigan
(50%) and Ohio (47%), followed by New York (42%) and Illinois (38%),
but to about a third of all seniors in California, Pennsylvania,
Colorado and Texas. In contrast, Medicare HMOs were a major source of
drug coverage in California (30%) and Colorado (24%), but assisted
fewer than 15% of seniors in the other six states.
Four of the
states included in the survey offer pharmacy assistance programs for
low-income seniors (IL, MI, NY, PA), but in each, large gaps in
coverage remain. In New York and Pennsylvania, whose pharmacy
assistance programs are among the largest and most extensive in the
nation, a significant share of low-income seniors lack prescription
coverage (20% and 25%, respectively). In Illinois and Michigan, the
percentage of low-income seniors without drug coverage (34% and 38%,
respectively) was at least as high as that in states without pharmacy
assistance programs.
"States are not
succeeding at solving the prescription drug coverage problem," said
Dana Gelb Safran, Sc.D., the principal investigator and lead author of
the Health Affairs article. "The fact that we found gaps in coverage
of this magnitude, even in states with programs that are widely viewed
as the gold standard, underscores the need for a national policy
solution."
SKIPPING
DOSES OR FORGOING MEDICATIONS DUE TO COST
A significant number of seniors reported that they forgo prescribed
medications due to high out-of-pocket costs. Nearly one-quarter of all
seniors (22%) said they did not fill a prescription because it was too
expensive or skipped doses of their medications to make them last
longer. Not surprisingly, these numbers are even higher among seniors
who lack coverage-35% of whom skipped doses or did not have
prescriptions filled.
Even patients
with severe and chronic conditions like heart disease and diabetes
often go without medications because of costs. Among seniors with
diabetes, nearly one third of those without drug coverage skipped
doses (30%) or did not fill a prescription (31%). Among seniors with
heart disease and without drug coverage, 33% reported skipping doses
and 25% didn't fill a prescription because of cost.
Low-income
seniors, regardless of whether they had coverage or not, had
difficulty meeting their prescription drug needs: 31% of all
low-income seniors and 42% of low-income seniors who lacked drug
coverage, either skipped doses or did not fill a prescription because
of costs. Among low-income seniors with some form of drug coverage,
37% of those enrolled in a Medicare HMO, 31% of those with Medigap,
28% of those helped by state pharmacy assistance programs, and 24
percent of those with Medicaid coverage reported skipping doses or
forgoing medication due to cost.
OUT-OF-POCKET SPENDING
Nearly one-quarter of all seniors (23%) in the eight states spent $100
or more per month on prescription drugs in 2001, which can be a
significant portion of their incomes (the average monthly income for
women ages 65 and older was $1,301 in 1999 and was $2,431 for men
65+). Among seniors without drug coverage 43% reported spending $100
or more per month, compared with 17% of seniors with some type of drug
coverage.
Out-of-pocket
drug costs varied widely by source of drug coverage. The survey found
that 35% of seniors with drug coverage under a Medigap policy, 25% of
those enrolled in state pharmacy assistance programs, and 19% of
seniors in Medicare HMOs spent at least $100 per month on
prescriptions in 2001. Only 8% of seniors with Medicaid coverage
reported these levels of out-of-pocket spending.
ROLE OF
MEDICAID
Medicaid is a key source of drug coverage for the poorest seniors in
all of the states surveyed, although Medicaid's reach varies across
states. In seven of the eight states, less than half of all seniors
living below the poverty level have drug coverage under Medicaid.
California's Medicaid program, MediCal, provides drug coverage to the
largest share of poor seniors (56%) of the states surveyed, followed
by New York (45%), Texas (44%), Colorado (34%), Michigan (32%),
Pennsylvania (25%) and Ohio (16%) and Illinois (14%).
The level of
protection seniors receive under Medicaid also varies by state. In
Colorado, Michigan, New York, and Pennsylvania, only four percent of
poor seniors with Medicaid reported that they spent $100 or more per
month on drugs. In contrast, 17% of poor seniors with Medicaid in
Ohio, 15% in Illinois, and 14% in Texas said they spent $100 or more
per month on drugs, four times the rate reported in the other four
states.
Medicare
beneficiaries on Medicaid tend to be in poorer health and rely more
heavily on multiple medications, compared with other seniors, yet
low-income seniors on Medicaid report lower out-of-pocket drug
spending than seniors with any other form of drug coverage. Eight
percent of low-income seniors with Medicaid spent more than $100 per
month on prescription drugs in 2001 compared with 39% of low-income
seniors with Medigap; 24% covered under a state pharmacy assistance
program or a Medicare HMO and 18% with employer-sponsored drug
coverage.
Many low income
seniors who may qualify for Medicaid or state pharmacy assistance
programs do not enroll in these programs, often because they believe
they do not qualify. In most states, approximately 9 out of 10 poor
seniors (living below the poverty level) have heard of the Medicaid
program. Among poor seniors who are not on Medicaid, one third said
they never thought of applying (35%) or think they have too much money
to qualify (30%). Sixteen percent did not apply because they
associated Medicaid with welfare, 14% feared losing other benefits or
their home if they applied, and 9% were deterred by complicated
application forms.
|